Despite growing public awareness and policy efforts, gender equality has not yet been fully established in Western societies. Previous research has shown that hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes, which are grounded in traditional gender stereotypes, play a key role in the reproduction of gender inequalities. Whereas, hostile and benevolent sexism among adolescents has been previously studied, limited attention has been paid to social characteristics in understanding the support for these attitudes. In this article, we aim to study how the family, the school and romantic partnerships relate to adolescents’ benevolent and hostile sexist attitudes. We relied on data gathered in 2013 by the Flemish Youth Research Platform and performed multivariate analyses on 755 parent-child dyads (n_> = 342; n₊ = 413). Our results indicate that social characteristics especially matter to explain the variation in benevolent sexist attitudes among girls and hostile sexist attitudes among boys. Among girls, being in a romantic relationship and parents’ traditional moral beliefs was strongly Primjeri profila purea related to benevolent sexism; while for boys, hostile sexism was strongly related to being enrolled in technical and vocational education. In the conclusion, we elaborate on the implications of our findings.

Introduction

Recently gender equality hasn’t only acquired growing social attention, but has become a significant coverage issue in Western societies. However, despite lasting services, gender equivalence hasn’t been fully created in terms of a position rates, work field updates, payment, contribution into the decision-to make ranks, workshare regarding house and childcare (The nation Financial, 2011; Eu, 2017). In the event multiple factors lay about these chronic gender inequalities, it is unquestionable that conventional gender opinions and you can stereotypes (we.age., gender bias) play a key part. Very early in daily life, boys, and girls are educated how exactly to work, just what points so you’re able to for example or perform and you will what playthings otherwise attire in order to like (Eccles et al., 2000). On ages of cuatro so you’re able to 5 years dated, college students inform you gender stereotypical choice that have, such as for instance, girls preferring personal stories and boys bending towards the the greater daring ones (Durkin and you may Nugent, 1998). These gender stereotypes hold cultural meanings, practices and you may (role) criterion that plan out life of the have a tendency to (subtly) impacting and you may at the rear of people’s thinking, thinking, thinking, and you will habits (Eckes and you will Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and you may Correll, 2004). During childhood, these types of gender stereotypes end up in boys and you will girls generally spending some time which have same-sex colleagues and you may playfully avoiding each other (Powlishta, 2003; ). Throughout adolescence that it avoidance games disappears due to the introduction out of sexual attraction and a desire for closeness (Maccoby, 1998; Rudman and you may Glick, 2008). These types of moving forward intergroup matchmaking render the research out-of adolescents’ sexist thinking very interesting. Sexist thinking and you can opinions limit and you can influence future lives trajectories because of the (will subtly) influencing viewpoints, thoughts, and behaviors (Eckes and you will Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and Correll, 2004). It suggest gender-certain routines and spots one hamper more youthful people’s ability to detect the various mental, societal, and you will informative capabilities and you may choices which may be envisioned (Rainey and you can Rust, 1999; Paul Halpern and Perry-Jenkins, 2016). In the course of time, this undermines (policy) services one strive for gender equivalence (Glick et al., 2001).

Benevolent and Hostile Sexism from inside the Personal Spheres: The latest Feeling away from Moms and dads, College and Relationship into Belgian Adolescents’ Sexist Thinking

With what personal contexts would sexist perceptions are present next? Studies have not yet carefully examined the fresh new possible societal adaptation regarding sexist perceptions certainly teenagers. Despite having a large extra worthy of inside putting on notion towards the sexist attitudes, extremely search on this subject thing has been primarily accomplished by psychologists just who tend to manage seemingly small and homogeneous samples. Mathematically it’s got for this reason been hard to data the new personal variation out-of sexist attitudes. Prior browse among (young) people has indicated that socio-monetary things particularly income, employment updates and you can informative attainment connect with mans socio-governmental attitudes (Crompton and you may Lyonette, 2005; Davis and you will Greenstein, 2009; ). Centered on so it, we expect one man’s social records issues whenever studying sexist attitudes. Therefore, this research is designed to explore exactly how socio-monetary and you can social elements connect with one another benevolent and you can hostile sexist attitudes among teens off an excellent sociological angle. We accomplish that following Glick and you will Fiske’s (1996) difference between aggressive and you will benevolent sexist attitudes. To grasp the newest socio-monetary and you may social records out of teens i distinguish ranging from ascribed and reached personal features.