Donaldson v. Are. Banco Corp., Inc., 945 F. Supp. 1456, 1464 (D. Colo. 1996); find including Piraino v. Int’l Direction Res., Inc., 84 F.3d 270, 274 (seventh Cir. 1996) (rejecting “stunning claim” of the accused that zero pregnancy discrimination is shown where confronted action happened immediately following birth of plaintiff’s baby); Pacourek v. Inland Material Co., 858 F. Supp. 1393, 1402 (N.D. Unwell. 1994) (estimating Legislative History of the fresh new PDA within 124 Cong. Rec. 38574 (1978)) (“[T]he PDA provides a lady ‘the right . . . becoming financially and you may legitimately secure before, during, and you will just after their pregnancy.'”).

Find, age.grams., Neessen v. Arona Corp., 2010 WL 1731652, from the *eight (N.D. Iowa ) (plaintiff was at PDA’s safe group where offender presumably don’t hire their own since the, during their software, she had also been pregnant and you can provided birth).

See, age.grams., Shafrir v. Ass’n regarding Change Zionists regarding Am., 998 F. Continue reading →