Partner tastes inside the internet dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Of attractive to appalling: Disenchantment with an enchanting companion. Sociological Point of views, 49, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]

Fiore, Good. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily in the matchmaking: Whenever do you really eg somebody such oneself? CHI, meeting towards peoples issues in calculating expertise. 1317-1374. [ Website links ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you will incompatibility in kids’ peer and aunt relationships. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can in conflict relationship (pp. 61-87). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A klicka för mer information beneficial. (2004). Wild birds away from an excellent feather or strange wild birds? Connections certainly one of character dimensions, resemblance, and ily Therapy, cuatro, 564-574. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Couples resemblance and you can marital fulfillment: Is equivalent spouses pleased. Record out of Character, 74, 1401-1420. [ Website links ]

Goffman, Age. (1952). For the air conditioning the prospective aside: Particular facet of version to help you inability. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Links ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, overlap, and you will matchmaking fulfillment within the relationships and you will married people. Diary away from Character and you may Public Mindset, 93, 34-forty eight. [ Links ]

Private Relationships, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Reflect, mirror: The significance of seems inside day to day life. Albany: County College of brand new York Force. [ Links ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Matching hypothesis. Into the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of people relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 10651067). Continue reading →